|
By Staff Reporter
Papua New Guinea’s firearms amnesty program has drawn sharp debate, with Police Minister Sir John Pundari insisting the initiative is about protecting communities rather than compensating lawbreakers. He was reacting to statements by Deputy Opposition Leader Keith Iduhu, who publicly questioned whether taxpayer funds should be used in the National Firearms Amnesty and Buy-Back Program. Sir John said the Government’s priority was to reduce the number of illegal high-powered weapons circulating in Enga, Hela and across the Highlands region, where tribal fighting has escalated in recent years. He said residents in affected areas were demanding practical solutions, not theoretical debates. He argued that labelling the initiative as a “payday for criminals” misrepresented its purpose. According to the Minister, the program targets young men who were drawn into violence due to limited economic options and clan pressures.
By providing financial incentives in exchange for guns, he said, families would be better positioned to invest in farming, trade stores and other income-generating activities, gradually shifting communities away from dependence on firearms. On criticism that the Government was neglecting the 2005 Singirok Report, Sir John said establishing peace was a prerequisite for enforcing stricter firearm controls and broader legislative reforms. He maintained that enforcement alone, without cooperation from communities, would only deepen tensions. “If a financial incentive prevents a single massacre, that is not a reward for criminals — it is a strategic investment in human life. We are choosing a path that avoids funerals,” he said. Headlines
Comments are closed.
|
Papua New Guinea Breaking NewsPapua New Guinea daily News updates Let Your Voice be heard: Submit your news articles, commentaries, letters , Photos, Media Releases etc to us on this email: [email protected]
Mining & PetroleumTop Links |
RSS Feed