The issue of illegal election practices, and especially bribery and undue influence featured prominently in a 50-plus-page ruling by the Supreme Court in Waigani.
A three-judge bench comprising Justices Ambeng Kandakasi, Derek Harthshorn and Joseph Yagi, made individual comments on the issue of election bribery, after dismissing an attempt by Paru Aihi to have the High Court review an earlier decision of the National Court, which ousted him as Member of Parliament for the Kairiku-Hiri people. Countless decisions of the Supreme Court over the years have raised serious concerns about the election process being flawed through bribery and undue influence by contesting candidates. President of the bench Justice Ambeng Kandakasi dedicated a good number of pages of the court's judgement to deliberate on the issue. Among his comments, Justice Kandakasi says hosting big parties and feasts, and giving of gifts is good, but is wrong when employed to influence an election outcome. He's noted that feasting and celebrations has always been a part of PNG culture, but has drastically be changed and incorporated especially during election time. Justice Kandakasi also questioned why monies earmarked or promised for certain electoral projects are never delivered on time until campaign time. Fellow judge Joseph Yagi says such practices remains a threat to a free, fair and democratic election. The court says it is time electors vote along party policy lines and not depending on who gives the most money or gifts. The court also noted failure by responsible authorities to prosecute illegal electoral processes after it is convicted in court, saying prosecuting those responsible will only send a strong message of deterrence to leaders and potential leaders. Comments are closed.
|
Papua New Guinea Breaking NewsPapua New Guinea daily News updates Let Your Voice be heard: Submit your news articles, commentaries, letters , Photos, Media Releases etc to us on this email: pngfacts@gmail.com
Mining & PetroleumTop Links |